Cases 101 - 110 of 2,587
Fisher v. N-Stock Box, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Mr. Donald Fisher
Defendant:
N-Stock Box, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Hammervold v. Beckwith
as 3:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Mark Hammervold
Defendant:
Larry Beckwith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bashaw v. Majestic Care of Whitehall, LLC
as 2:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Kirstyn Paige Bashaw
Defendant:
Majestic Care of Whitehall, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Eric J. Wittenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
King v. SCH Terminal Services, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Curtis J. King
Defendant:
SCH Terminal Services, LLC, SCH Services, LLC, Calvert City Terminal, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Clark v. Blue Care Network of Michigan
as 2:2022cv13016
Plaintiff:
Indeiria Clark
Defendant:
Blue Care Network of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan Doing business as BCN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Thompson v. Diversey, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Brandon Thompson
Defendant:
Diversey, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Custer v. Google LLC
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Adam Custer
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Sedric Ward v. Shelby County, TN
as 22-6054
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SEDRIC WARD
Defendant / Appellant:
SHELBY COUNTY, TN
Foreman v. Eastman Schwartz Building, LLC
as 3:2022cv02175
Plaintiff:
George Foreman, Jr.
Defendant:
Eastman Schwartz Building, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Matthew Denholm v. ADT, LLC
as 22-6116
Not Yet Classified:
MATTHEW T. DENHOLM, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board and ADT, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
