Cases 111 - 120 of 37,111
Adams v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
as 1:2024cv01878
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jose Adams
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustin, Jose A. v. Lin et al
as 9:2024cv80551
Plaintiff:
Jose Anderson Augustin
Defendant:
Adam Lin and Swigert Anthony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
LLOYD ANTHONY DAVIS
Defendant:
FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, REGION 1 PHARMACY and FNU PAWKK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Achey v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 5:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Achey
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mills v. Clay County Courts et al
as 3:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mills
Defendant:
Clay County Courts and Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEIGH v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE DESHUN LEIGH
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Hasan H. Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Cook, FNU Shinn, FNU Bostic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RUSSAW v. TALTON et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARIO RUSSAW
Defendant:
CULLEN TALTON, ADA RODRIGO L SILVA, EDWARD D LUKEMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills, Wallace v. Clay County Courts et al
as 1:2024cv21635
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mills
Defendant:
Clay County Courts and Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan, Robert Lewis v. Osborne
as 1:2024cv21668
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis Morgan and Robert Lewis Morgan Jr.
Defendant:
Jonathan Kent Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
