Cases 111 - 120 of 35,785
Celillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024at00422
Plaintiff:
Michelle Diana Celillo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Cody Edward Carpenter v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv02773
Plaintiff:
Cody Edward Carpenter
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ner v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02086
Plaintiff:
Maria Ner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Abrum Sarsfield v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02795
Plaintiff:
Abrum Sarsfield
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kenneth Burgarin v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02797
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Burgarin
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mark Alan Woodend v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Woodend
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
LaTisha Ballard v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
LaTisha Ballard
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(SS) Terrel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Brandon Terrel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(SS) Aninion v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Virgil Parami Aninion
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
King v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02047
Plaintiff:
Troy Demond King
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
