Cases 111 - 120 of 10,858
Butler v. Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority et al
as 3:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Constance A. Butler
Defendant:
Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority and Steven Nesmith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Adams v. Mohawk Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Mark Adams
Defendant:
Mohawk Industries, Inc. and DAL-TILE, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lisle v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Loreen L. Lisle
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III and Frank D. Whitworth, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shephard v. Diamond et al
as 7:2024cv00244
Petitioner:
Charles O. Shephard
Respondent:
Alexander Diamond, Patricia Diamond, Guy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Burgess v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Earl Dushawn Burgess
Defendant:
Virginia Commonwealth of and Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baxter v. HII Mission Technologies Corp.
as 1:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Kelly Baxter
Defendant:
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Washington Jr. v. Stafford County Sheriffs Office
as 1:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Randull K. Washington Jr.
Defendant:
Stafford County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
