Cases 111 - 120 of 22,855
Sexton v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sexton
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
H. v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Andres DeMendoza H.
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Doctors Medcare et al
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Joseph Chad Riley
Defendant:
Doctors Medcare, Carrie McClung, Sgt. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv08010
Petitioner:
Brandon Maurice Butler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Letterlough v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00446
Petitioner:
Nyree Letterlough
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clark v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Braxton Clark
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florence v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Florence
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Futral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Marshall et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Garrett, Jr
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Alabama, State of, The, Talladega, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gammons v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Arthur Gammons
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
