Cases 111 - 120 of 24,266
Njus v. Warden McClean County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv01154
Petitioner:
Joel Njus
Respondent:
Warden McClean County Detention Center
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Anglin v. Benning et al
as 1:2024cv01145
Plaintiff:
Phillip Anglin
Defendant:
Zachary Benning and Samer Assaf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Curran et al
as 3:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Michael R Hendricks
Defendant:
. Curran, Heather .., Kylee .. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Ford v. Ek et al
as 2:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Hundley Ford, Jr
Defendant:
Jonathan Ek, Jennifer Chacon and Michelle Babb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
