Cases 121 - 130 of 583
United States of America v. Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01220
Defendant:
Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee, Janice P. Brannen and James E. Brannen
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United State of America et al v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 0.38 Acre of Land, More Or Less, in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv00969
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 0.38 Acre of Land, More Or Less, in Montgomery County, Tennessee, Peter M. Olson and Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
United State of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, L.P. v. 0.308 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Paulding County, Ohio et al
as 3:2018cv00700
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, L.P.
Defendant:
0.308 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Paulding County, Ohio, R&K Brady Corporation and Paulding Wind Farm IV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Hong et al
as 4:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking & Trust Company
Defendant:
Loi M. Hong, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Unknown Spouse and others
Miscellaneou:
Warning Order Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. An Easemaent And Right-Of-Way Over 4.38 Acers of Land et al
as 3:2017cv01538
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 4.38 Acers of Land, More or Less, In Montgomery County, Tennessee, John Johnson Teeter, Tammy Teeter Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
