Cases 121 - 130 of 9,832
Mangus v. Kiefer et al
as 2:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Teresa Mangus
Defendant:
Joseph Kiefer and Stasy Avelar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Graven v. Snow et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
William A Graven
Defendant:
G Murray Snow, Mary H Murguia, John C Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Gethsemani Baptist Church v. San Luis, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Gethsemani Baptist Church
Defendant:
San Luis, City of, Nieves G Riedel, Jenny Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Scott v. United States Government
as 2:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hookom et al v. Chandler Unified School District et al
as 2:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Darin Hookom and Karen Hookom
Defendant:
Chandler Unified School District, Patrick Power, Unknown Power and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
