Civil Rights Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 121 - 130 of 17,605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02264
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dibrell v. PNC Bank et al
as 3:2024cv00115
Plaintiff: Calvin L Dibrell
Defendant: PNC Bank and Brock and Scott, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Anderson v. Wendy's of Bowling Green Inc.
as 3:2024cv00500
Plaintiff: Lonnita Anderson
Defendant: Wendy's of Bowling Green Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
King v. 17th Judicial Drug Task Force et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff: David Michael King
Defendant: 17th Judicial Drug Task Force, Steven Daugherty and Casey Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #062 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: John Doe #062
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Meigs County Government et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff: NATHAN ALEXANDER SMITH
Defendant: MEIGS COUNTY GOVERNMENT and ROBERT J LEONARD
Intervenor: Kenneth Andrew Colbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?