Cases 121 - 130 of 84,223
Behm v. General Motors LLC
as 0:2024cv01517
Plaintiff:
Michael Behm
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, OnStar, LLC and LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Dunaiski v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01520
Plaintiff:
Perry Dunaiski
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mangum v. Beltz et al
as 0:2024cv01505
Petitioner:
Leonard Mangum
Respondent:
Tracy Beltz and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
T&T Management, Inc. v. Choice Hotels International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01504
Plaintiff:
T&T Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Choice Hotels International, Inc., Radisson Hotels International, Inc., Sunshine Fund Port Orange, LLC and others
Street Factory Media, Inc. v. Fierce Whiskers Distillery, LLC
as 0:2024cv01508
Plaintiff:
Street Factory Media, Inc.
Defendant:
Fierce Whiskers Distillery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
