Cases 131 - 140 of 848
Ponder v. Maaranu et al
as 1:2021cv01239
Plaintiff:
Darnell Ponder
Defendant:
Khaazra Maaranu
Nominal Defendant:
Electronic Commerce LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
VARGAS v. RAYAT et al
as 2:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
ZOSER VARGAS
Defendant:
HARMEL RAYAT, THOMAS BOLD, KAIYO NEDD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
MEYER v. RAYAT et al
as 2:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
AVIVA MEYER
Defendant:
HARMEL S. RAYAT, THOMAS BOLD, KAIYO NEDD and others
VAN HOOSER v. SCHLOTTERBECK et al
as 2:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
GARY VAN HOOSER
Defendant:
STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JUCHHEIM v. JULABO USA, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
RALPH JUCHHEIM
Defendant:
JULABO USA, INC., Markus G. Juchheim and Gerhard E. Juchheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STIFEL TRUST COMPANY, N.A. v. KING PROPERTIES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20394
Plaintiff:
STIFEL TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Defendant:
KING PROPERTIES, INC., FISHER ENTERPRISES, INC. and J. DENNIS DEVINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEIN v. SCHLOTTERBECK et al
as 2:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
SHIVA STEIN
Defendant:
STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tarek Holdings, LLC et al v. Shockley et al
as 2:2021cv20582
Plaintiff:
Tarek Holdings, LLC and Tarek Abousalem
Defendant:
Greg Shockley and James Shockley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAREK HOLDINGS, LLC et al v. GREG SHOCKLEY et al
as 2:2021cv20581
Plaintiff:
Tarek Holdings, LLC and Tarek Abousalem
Defendant:
Shock Global Partners, LLC, Greg Shockley and James Shockley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pinyavat v. Hirsch et al
as 1:2021cv01309
Plaintiff:
Alan Pinyavat
Defendant:
Douglas Hirsch, Trevor Bezdek, Karsten Voermann and others
Nominal Defendant:
GoodRx Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
