Cases 141 - 150 of 6,401
Moore v. Gray
as 1:2023cv11973
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dwayne Moore
Defendant:
Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pelletier v. Aramark
as 1:2023cv11765
Plaintiff:
Roland Joseph Pelletier
Defendant:
Aramark, Wayne Ivey, Yes Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dower v. George et al
as 1:2023cv11663
Plaintiff:
Darius Dower
Defendant:
Derek George, Plymouth Police Department, Erin George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosser-Stewart v. USA
as 1:2023cv12053
Petitioner:
Stephan Rosser-Stewart
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Agneta v. Mici et al
as 4:2023cv11664
Plaintiff:
David Agneta
Defendant:
Carol Mici, Sergio Servello, Lew Evangelidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Freebirds Publishing
as 1:2023cv11574
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Defendant:
Freebirds Publishing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ainooson v. O'Gara et al
as 1:2023cv11478
Plaintiff:
Justice E. Ainooson
Defendant:
James O'Gara, Sheila C Kelly, Joann Lynds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kim v. Gray
as 1:2023cv11956
Petitioner:
Daniel Larry Kim
Respondent:
Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios v. Old Colony Correctional Center (OCCC) et al
as 1:2023cv11538
Plaintiff:
Ray Luis Rios
Defendant:
Old Colony Correctional Center (OCCC) and Charleston A. Stevenson
Consolidated Defendant:
Anthony Stevenson, Dean Grey and Michael Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
