Cases 151 - 160 of 32,635
US v. Lara-Martinez
as 24-1288
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ALDRIN MANUEL LARA-MARTINEZ
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Petitioner:
FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Paramasivam v. Blinkin et al
as 1:2024cv10757
Plaintiff:
Sivakumar Paramasivam
Defendant:
Secretary of State Antony Blinkin, Secretary of USDHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morgan v. Garland
as 24-1280
Petitioner:
AKEISH JOHNIOY MORGAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Sanches Alves, et al v. Garland
as 24-1258
Petitioner:
MATEUS SANCHES ALVES, FRANCIELE DOS REIS OLIMPIO ALVES and E.M.S.R.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Alvarez Mendoza v. Garland
as 24-1260
Petitioner:
JOSE RENE ALVAREZ MENDOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
5-Star General Store et al v. American Express Company et al
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
5-Star General Store, Bento LLC, Marc Allen, Inc. and others
Defendant:
American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
