Cases 151 - 160 of 8,494
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
DiLeo v. Simmons University et al
as 1:2024cv10005
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph DiLeo and Pro se litigant Andrew Joseph DiLeo
Defendant:
Simmons University and UHS- Fuller doing business as Arbour Fuller Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Caraballo v. Bristol County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv10324
Plaintiff:
Raymond Caraballo
Defendant:
Bristol County Sheriff's Office, Thomas Hodgson, Intake and Classification Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Porter Jr v. City of Framingham et al
as 4:2024cv40007
Plaintiff:
Richard W Porter Jr
Defendant:
City of Framingham, McDermott Revokeable Trust, James McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kersey v. Republican National Committee
as 1:2024cv10387
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
Republican National Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Porter Jr v. Commonwealth Superior Court's Division's et al
as 4:2024cv40028
Plaintiff:
Richard W Porter Jr
Defendant:
Commonwealth Superior Court's Division's, Worcester Superior Court and Essex Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
