Cases 151 - 160 of 227,377
GENELIEN v. VERIZON WIRELESS et al
as 3:2024cv06134
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO-MURLLER GENELIEN
Defendant:
VERIZON WIRELESS and HANS VESTBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sanchez-Leyva v. Warden, FCI Fort Dix
as 1:2024cv06118
Petitioner:
GERARDO ANTONIO SANCHEZ-LEYVA
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BLACKSTONE v. PLATKIN et al
as 3:2024cv06127
Petitioner:
CLEVESTER BLACKSTONE
Respondent:
MATTHEW J. PLATKIN, N.J. STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, N.J. STATE GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. DODSON et al
as 1:2024cv06105
Plaintiff:
MALIK S. JONES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. DODSON, JAMES HERBERT, JAMES BARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOCKER v. KELLY et al
as 1:2024cv06107
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
MICHAEL KELLY, LT. KINSLEY and ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
