Cases 161 - 170 of 639,852
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv02560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Cabrera Soto
as 5:2024cv02553
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Maria D. Cabrera Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Tingle v. Defilippis
as 4:2024cv02543
Plaintiff:
Aaron Kristopher Tingle
Defendant:
Steve Defilippis and Law Office of Picone and Defilippis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
N.A. v. U.S.A. et al
as 4:2024cv02561
Plaintiff:
N.A.
Defendant:
U.S.A. and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Catalyst Inc. v. Empathy Catalyst Consulting
as 3:2024cv02557
Plaintiff:
Catalyst Inc.
Defendant:
Empathy Catalyst Consulting
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Hoang v. Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02564
Plaintiff:
Ha T. Hoang
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Violation of Credit Repair Organizations Act
(PS) Hedrington v. United States of America, et al.
as 2:2024cv01224
Plaintiff:
Orlonzo Hedrington
Defendant:
United States of America, Fairfield Police Department and County of Solano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
