Cases 181 - 190 of 1,153
Sanchez v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2020cv00304
Petitioner:
Thomas Sanchez
Respondent:
Particia Coyne-Fague and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hazard v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2020cv00299
Petitioner:
David W. Hazard
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barkmeyer, Jr. v. Wall
as 1:2020cv00249
Petitioner:
Ronald Barkmeyer, Jr.
Respondent:
A.T. Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fontes v. Lopez et al
as 1:2020cv00151
Defendant:
Lieutenant Atella, Mario Lopez, Deputy Warden Jeffery Aceto and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Scott Fontes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hanson v. Bourget et al
as 1:2020cv00223
Plaintiff:
Allen J Hanson and Allen Jason Coviello
Defendant:
Matthew Simon, East Providence Police Department, Raymond Blinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wieczorek v. Clarke et al
as 1:2020cv00214
Defendant:
Lieutenant Devine, Nurse Nancy, Deputy Warden Jeffery Aceto and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Wieczorek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. USA
as 1:2020cv00213
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jarrod Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Arevalo Carrillo v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2020cv00192
Respondent:
MATTHEW T ALBENCE, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S Attorney General William Barr and others
Petitioner:
Elmer Alfredo Arevalo Carrillo
Defendant:
Acting Director Todd Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sevegny v. Eleanor Slater Hospital
as 1:2020cv00173
Defendant:
Eleanor Slater Hospital
Plaintiff:
Bryan Sevegny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sevegny v. Eleanor Slater Hospital, et al
as 1:2020cv00174
Defendant:
Eleanor Slater Hospital Legal Dept., Eleanor Slater Hospital and Eleanor Slater Hospital Patient Resources and Benefits
Plaintiff:
Bryan Sevegny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
