Cases 11 - 20 of 2,592
Wagner v. Landair Transport, Inc
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WAGNER
Defendant:
Landair Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Hale v. Woodward et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Connie Hale
Defendant:
John Michael Woodward and Cloudcookies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Other Labor Litigation
Gray v. Pace Academy et al
as 2:2024cv10971
Plaintiff:
GRITIANA GRAY
Defendant:
PACE ACADEMY, JOSEPH POLLACK, ACADEMIC CENTER OF EXCELLENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Currie et al v. My Fav Electronics, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Paula B. Currie and Megan Finnegan-Ratliff
Defendant:
My Fav Electronics, Inc. doing business as Second Life Mac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Kirstyn Bashaw v. Majestic Care of Whitehall, LLC
as 24-3292
Plaintiff:
KIRSTYN PAIGE BASHAW
Defendant:
MAJESTIC CARE OF WHITEHALL, LLC
Hodge v. White et al
as 2:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
James Albert Hodge
Defendant:
Quin White and New Era Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Carlyle v. Stryker Employment Company, LLC
as 2:2024cv02226
Plaintiff:
John Carlyle
Defendant:
Stryker Employment Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Banks v. Geodis Logistics, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Michael Banks
Defendant:
Geodis Logistics, LLC, Anthony Sweeney, Ryan Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Gray v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al
as 2:2024cv10373
Plaintiff:
Latoya Gray, Latoya Hunter, Latoya Hunter-Ford and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW), UAW Local 228, Glenn Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
