Cases 11 - 20 of 230,884
(PC) Eke v. State of California
as 2:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Chidi Joachim Eke
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Thomas v. Ali et al
as 1:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Mohammed Ali and Ngozi Igbinosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wintrode v. Captain Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Captain Hughes, Sgt. Ron Owen, Deputy Rebecca Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Hill
Defendant:
State of Montana, Montana State Prison, James Salmonsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re Jeremiah Wiberg
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Robert Wiberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Holz et al
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Holz, Bartlette, Brendal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Kuloloia et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
William Kuloloia, Russel, Dons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blockson v. Oliver
as 2:2024cv00809
Petitioner:
Christopher Leonard Blockson
Respondent:
Ronald Oliver and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toelle v. Warden of Victorville Camp FCI Med, I
as 2:2024cv00815
Petitioner:
Loren Michelle Toelle
Respondent:
Warden of Victorville Camp FCI Med, I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Melville v. Henley et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Melville
Defendant:
Warden Henley, Bashor and Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
