Cases 11 - 20 of 1,335
Riley v. Sims
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jay Scot Riley
Defendant:
David P. Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riley v. Severa
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jay Scot Riley
Defendant:
Larry A. Severa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
McCleary v. Nelmark et al
as 9:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jaysen McCleary
Defendant:
David Nelmark and Scott Beattie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
O'Neil et al v. Montana Supreme Court et al
as 9:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Jerry O'Neil, Gene Kirschbaum, Russell Sias and others
Defendant:
Montana Supreme Court, State Bar of Montana, The Montana Supreme Court and the State Bar of of Montana, joined together as the Integrated Bar of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
Gates v. Ives et al
as 2:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Tyler Gates
Defendant:
Matt Ives and Richard Pasha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Soete v. Clucas
as 9:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Soete and Sheldon L Soete
Defendant:
Matthew Clucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Melvin v. Klambach et al
as 9:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ronald P. Melvin
Defendant:
Justin Kalmbach and James Lapotka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
