Cases 11 - 20 of 7,758
Wright v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Vickie Wright
Defendant:
Sevier County, Tennessee, Bart Tyner, Mark Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Noe v. Grainger County et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Glenn Noe
Defendant:
Grainger County, Grainger Co Sheriff James Harville and Cody Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kelly v. Advance Financial et al
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Henderson Kelly, Jr.
Defendant:
Advance Financial and Wendy's of Bowling Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anemana v. Mayorkas
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Alexis Anemana
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
John Doe #045 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John Doe #045
Defendant:
William Lee, David Rausch and Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashbrook v Meigs County, Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Hannah Ashbrook
Defendant:
Meigs County, TN, State of Tennessee, Attorney Casey Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Alexander et al
as 2:2024cv02302
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ricardo Smith
Defendant:
Virginia M. Alexander, Robert Duck and Janeen R. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King et al v. Quad-R, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Dillon King and Allison King
Defendant:
Quad-R, Inc. doing business as Rae Products Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hayes v. White et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Dawn Hayes
Defendant:
Patrick White and Paul Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Dabit v. City of Chattanooga
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Sana Dabit
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
