Cases 21 - 30 of 9,694
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jackson v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Tameika Jackson
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Moniesha Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Scott v. McLennan County Texas et al
as 6:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Bennie Daryl Scott
Defendant:
McLennan County Texas, Parnell McNamara, Ricky Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dowling v. United States Attorney's Office
as 5:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Angela D. Dowling and Angela Perez Dowling
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bourne et al v. Liker et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Defendant:
Bridgette K Losey, Kelly Suzanne Liker, Ascension Health doing business as Dell Children's Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Lorina Bourne and Jason Troy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
