Cases 21 - 30 of 469
City of Southfield General Employees' Retirement System v. National Vision Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
City of Southfield General Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
National Vision Holdings, Inc., L. Reade Fahs and Patrick R. Moore
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Patel
as 2:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Milan V. Patel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Tenor Capital Partners, LLC v. GunBroker.com, LLC
as 1:2020cv00613
Defendant:
Tenor Capital Partners, LLC
Plaintiff:
GunBroker.com, LLC
Respondent:
AMMO, Inc.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arbab et al
as 1:2022cv04321
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Syed Arham Arbab, Tomas Javier Jimenez, Blake Douglas McKinney and others
AMPB Metals Exports, Inc. et al v. Metal Scrap Solution, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04026
Plaintiff:
AMPB Metals Exports, Inc., CCP Investments, LLC and Ravi Patel
Defendant:
Metal Scrap Solution, LLC, Scrapz Metalz, LLC, Rahul Garg and others
Bushansky v. Evo Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03785
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Evo Payments, Inc., James G. Kelly, Rafik R. Sidhom and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dishinger et al
as 1:2022cv03258
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Ann Dishinger, Jerrold I. Palmer, Lawrence M. Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Parrino
as 1:2022cv03888
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Charles Parrino
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Bushansky v. CatchMark Timber Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03157
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
CatchMark Timber Trust, Inc., Tim E. Bentsen, Brian M. Davis and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
