Cases 21 - 30 of 10,818
Edward v. McIntosh County Board of Commissioners et al
as 6:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Frank Edward, Jr.
Defendant:
McIntosh County Board of Commissioners, Monica Smith and Mary Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00407
Petitioner:
Turischevia J Harris
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Mable Bassett Correctional Center and Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruner v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Jamele R Bruner
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loftis v. Conway
as 6:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Embry Jay Loftis
Defendant:
Cody Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gravlee v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
John Christian Gravlee
Defendant:
FNU Tibbs, FNU Prince, FNU Kala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. SSI Disability et al
as 5:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lonnell Lewis
Defendant:
SSI Disability and ODOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center Trust
as 5:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bear Walker
Defendant:
Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Buss et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Channen Ray Ozell Smith
Defendant:
David Buss, Getner Drummond and Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Harding
as 6:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Anthony Ryan Green
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Salinas v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Orlando Salinas
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Devra Atwood, Bryan Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
