Cases 21 - 30 of 1,995
Fantel, Jr. v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Fantel, Jr. v. FBI et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
FBI, Caitlin Isherwood and Mark Trovato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Huntley v. Piccirillo et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Huntley
Defendant:
Nurse David Piccirillo, DOC Medical Director, D.O.C Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Joseph v. Rhode Island State Police et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tamara Joseph
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, State Police Department, Colonel Darnell S. Weaver, State Trooper Michael Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. Casey et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Vanuel Bryant
Defendant:
Sgt. Devan J. Casey, Lt. Keith Clarke, Major Dennis Skorski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
