Cases 31 - 40 of 53,693
Horton v. Richerson et al
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Horton
Defendant:
Kelly Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brookstone Building Company LLC v. Axis Surplus Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Brookstone Building Company LLC
Defendant:
Axis Surplus Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Dawson et al v. Lauderdale County et al
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Dawson and Timothy Weakley
Defendant:
Lauderdale County, State of Alabama, Lauderdale County Revenue Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Arc Realty LLC
as 2:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J Arko and Andrew M Moore
Defendant:
Arc Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Houser v. O'Neil et al
as 2:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Lecresha Renae Houser
Defendant:
Sean B O'Neil, Tracy Anne Pangillinan, Brett Seybold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gibson v. Experian Information Solutions Inc
as 5:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Michael Gibson
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rucker v. Hunter Wakefield Inc
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rucker
Defendant:
Hunter Wakefield Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Steven Keith Jones
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Chevelle K Hunte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
