Cases 31 - 40 of 6,807
Wills v. Cohen
as 5:2024cv00708
Petitioner:
Theodore Wills
Respondent:
Warden Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Middleton v. Columbia Regional Care Center
as 5:2024cv00724
Petitioner:
Dedric Middleton
Respondent:
Columbia Regional Care Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brogdon v. Graham
as 5:2024cv01706
Petitioner:
Conell Brogdon
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Haney v. Beckwith
as 2:2024cv01716
Petitioner:
Tron L. Haney
Respondent:
Warden Beckwith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newberry v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2024cv01678
Petitioner:
Phillip D. Newberry
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Langdon, III
as 1:2024cv00771
Petitioner:
Antonio Emerson Tate
Respondent:
William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Kirkland Corr. Ins/ State of South Carolina
as 0:2024cv01674
Petitioner:
Jerome Curry and (Flesh And Blood Man)
Respondent:
Kirkland Corr. Ins/ South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bedford v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024cv01680
Petitioner:
Emanual Aurmond Bedford
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stroman v. Calhoun County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv00698
Petitioner:
Shaneeka Stroman
Respondent:
Calhoun County Sheriffs Department and St. Matthews Magistrate Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Richman v. Graham
as 9:2024cv01635
Petitioner:
Ulysses Richman
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
