Cases 31 - 40 of 75,118
CHESTNUT v. ACP/467 et al
as 2:2024cv01674
Plaintiff:
TARA CHESTNUT
Defendant:
ACP/467, CHIDIALDI EZENGWU, CHANELL PRATER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
SAMPEY v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE et al
as 2:2024cv05691
Plaintiff:
AMANDA SAMPEY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE, TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Chief of Police JAMES ABBOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CONTEH v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv05689
Plaintiff:
ADAMA CONTEH
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION d/b/a, STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
OLMA v. TOWNSHIP OF PLAINSBORO et al
as 3:2024cv05654
Plaintiff:
BRETT J. OLMA
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF PLAINSBORO, MAYOR PETER A. CANTU, ADMINISTRATOR ANTHONY CANCRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PINCKNEY v. HONORABLE ROBERT G. WILSON et al
as 3:2024cv05682
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY PINCKNEY
Defendant:
HONORABLE ROBERT G. WILSON and SOMERSET SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LISTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LISTER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER REGINALD GRAHAM and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
