Cases 31 - 40 of 3,108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Barber v. Lampman et al
as 8:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
RaySean Barber
Defendant:
Ben Lampman and Other Unkown Individuals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jurgens v. City of Omaha
as 8:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Linda Jurgens
Defendant:
City of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Barfield-Peak v. Rudolph
as 8:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Terrijana Barfield-Peak
Defendant:
Angie Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. National Action Network Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rogers
Defendant:
National Action Network Inc., Alfred Charles Sharpton, Jr., Peter Joseph Gleason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sipple v. Kramer et al
as 4:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
Adam T Sipple
Defendant:
Deputy Roland Kramer and Devin Ruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Emrit v. Grammys Awards on CBS
as 4:2024cv03005
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Grammys Awards on CBS doing business as The Recording Academy/National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences (NARAS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
