Cases 31 - 40 of 30,330
ORR v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, BUTLER, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Redding
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brian Johnson
Defendant:
Timothy Redding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARCHANT v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
AUTUMN MARCHANT
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, AMELIA BRUNER, CHRISTINA NUDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Elkhart County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Tervarus L Gary
Defendant:
Elkhart County Sheriffs Department, Jeff Segal and Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TISHNER v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv00724
Petitioner:
JOSHUA W. TISHNER
Respondent:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAMS v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
RAYMOND D. SAMS
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JEWEL v. KNOX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY GENE JEWEL, JR.
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. and DOUG VANTLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRASHEAR v. WARDEN (N.C.C.F.)
as 1:2024cv00727
Petitioner:
EDWARD BRASHEAR
Respondent:
WARDEN (N.C.C.F.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jennings v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00344
Petitioner:
Quinton Jennings
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2024cv00342
Defendant:
William Hyatte, Bill, Pully and others
Plaintiff:
Imari Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
