Cases 31 - 40 of 8,323
Moreno v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv02900
Plaintiff:
Elmer Moreno
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zaragosa-Solis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv02901
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02969
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Flores
Defendant:
The State of New York, Department of Corrections Community Supervision, Officer S. Mentigny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowell et al v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B. Rowell
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Michael Young
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gholston v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Marcal Gholston
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Nester Maldonado
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billie v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Bernard E. Billie
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spigner et al v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Colomba Spigner
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Nassau Health Care Corporation, Nassau County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Hussien
as 1:2024cv02656
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jordan and Jerome Watkins
Defendant:
Abdulla Hussien and King Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
