Death Penalty Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Sneed v. Dunn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv01442
Petitioner: Ulysses Charles Sneed
Respondent: Jefferson S Dunn
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Gordy et al
as 1:2016cv01041
Petitioner: Derrick Lamar Davis
Respondent: Christopher Gordy and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barber v. Dunn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00473
Petitioner: James Edward Barber
Respondent: Jefferson F Dunn
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gavin v. Dunn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00273
Petitioner: Keith Edmund Gavin
Respondent: Jefferson S Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marshall v. Dunn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01694
Petitioner: William Bruce Marshall
Respondent: Jefferson S Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Sharp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00384
Petitioner: Kenneth Eugene Smith
Respondent: William G. Sharp, Jr. and Luther Strange
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Musgrove v. Thomas
as 2:2014cv02252
Petitioner: Donnis George Musgrove
Respondent: Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perkins v. Thomas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2014cv01814
Petitioner: Roy E Perkins
Respondent: Kim Thomas and Walter Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stewart v. Thomas
as 1:2014cv01313
Petitioner: Charles Randall Stewart
Respondent: Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McWhorter v. Thomas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv02150
Petitioner: Casey A. McWhorter
Respondent: Kim T Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?