Cases 31 - 40 of 429,371
v. MURZIKE et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Defendant:
JAMES T. MURZIKE, D ELLIS, T THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
RONNIE BRYANT
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, MS LESLEY and ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASEY v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M CASEY
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. EDENFIELD MOBILE HOME SERVICE & REPAIR INC
as 5:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
EDENFIELD MOBILE HOME SERVICE & REPAIR INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY v. REYCO CONTRACTING SOLUTIONS LLC
as 3:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
REYCO CONTRACTING SOLUTIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HUNTER v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 4:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
JASON HUNTER, SR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CHRISTINE PLETCHER, THEODORE JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WESLEY v. PAYNE et al
as 5:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN WESLEY, JR
Defendant:
S PAYNE and C WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
