Cases 31 - 40 of 8,482
McCoy v. Moore
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Norris R. McCoy
Defendant:
Officer Ronisha Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hasuan v. Ferra et al
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
George Ferra, Glynn County Detention Center and Sheriff E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cardwell v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Duval F. Cardwell
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Major Mitchell, Major Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr., Micky Eugene Hamilton, Jed Allen Taylor and others
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. GARMON
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOWE
Defendant:
MS GARMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard v. Chambers et al
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Brandon Xavier Heard
Defendant:
Warden Chambers, Deputy Warden Prosser, ADA Warden Messer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Garmon
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Ms. Christopher Lowe
Defendant:
Unit Manager Garmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WISHON v. JACKSON STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
SETH AXLEY WISHON
Defendant:
JACKSON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Harmon et al
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Gregory Simpson
Defendant:
Investigator Harmon and Ms. Flemming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
