Cases 31 - 40 of 4,097
CHRISTOPHER v. FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
INISHA CHRISTOPHER
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. DENIES et al
as 5:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
RODNEY J MILES
Defendant:
MR HINES, MR CLARK and DENIES TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS BOYD
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON, HANCOCK STATE PRISON STAFF, HANCOCK STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITTLE v. DOOLY STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, CAPTAIN RODRIGEZ, COUNSELOR GERMANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. WILSON et al
as 5:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARDS
Defendant:
WILSON, BERRY, CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SMITH
as 5:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
JR RICHARD MONTA JOHNSON and RICHARD MONTA JOHNSON, JR
Defendant:
TAMARSHAY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWSTER v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION et al
as 4:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION and Officer MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WORTHEN v. WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL
as 4:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
WALLACE ALLEN WORTHEN, JR
Defendant:
WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. BAILEY et al
as 5:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
PAUL BAILEY and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOSTER v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
JOHN M FOSTER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WILKES, WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
