Cases 31 - 40 of 8,483
Boggs v. Range Rover et al
as 1:2024cv10983
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Range Rover and Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hernandez v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2024cv30054
Plaintiff:
Angel Hernandez
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Steven Tatro, Anthony Pioggia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boggs v. 34 Bowdoin et al
as 1:2024cv10986
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
34 Bowdoin and Alisa, Mike
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boggs v. Children Hospital
as 1:2024cv10984
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Children Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DiGregorio v. Otis et al
as 1:2024cv10422
Plaintiff:
Nicholas DiGregorio
Defendant:
Robert Otis, Wilson Alves, Brockton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
TrailblazHers Run Co. et al v. Boston Athletic Association et al
as 1:2024cv10950
Plaintiff:
TrailblazHers Run Co., Abeo Powder, Elizabeth Rock and others
Defendant:
Boston Athletic Association, City of Newton and John F. Carmichael Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gould et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 3:2024cv30033
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elliot Gould and Jonathan Chad Brown
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Jonathan Kane, Maria C. Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stoops v. No Defendants
as 1:2024cv10957
Plaintiff:
Dorothy J. Stoops
Defendant:
No Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
