Cases 51 - 60 of 1,151
Diaz v. Salisbury, et al.
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Defendant:
Wayne Salisbury, Carole Dwyer, Jack Shamks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sevegny v. Robinson et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Bryan Sevegny
Defendant:
Christine Robinson, Assistant Director- Rhode Island Department of Corrections and Vanessa Lisi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. LeClair et al
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Tony G. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Brian LeClair, Paul Rioles, Tracey Bonang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeker v. Houston House
as 1:2023cv00148
Petitioner:
Gregory Meeker
Respondent:
Houston House and Patrick McFarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Navarro v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Angel L. Navarro
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lake v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2020cv00149
Respondent:
Particia Coyne-Fague, Patricia A. Coyne-Fague and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Petitioner:
Adam Lake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vose v. Neronha
as 1:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Carlton Vose
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney Peter Neronha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moller v. USA
as 1:2023cv00151
Petitioner:
Michael J. Moller
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jenyo v. RRM Philadelphia
as 1:2023cv00083
Petitioner:
Babawale F. Jenyo
Respondent:
RRM Philadelphia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Levy v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv00079
Petitioner:
Barbara Levy
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
