Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 51 - 60 of 35,013
VanBuskirk, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6079
Plaintiff: AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant: STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6080
Plaintiff: AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant: STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Spalding v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, et al
as 24-6081
Petitioner: DAVID L. SPALDING
Respondent: ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE US COURTS, WARDEN GOLDEY, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Custodia Bank v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors, et al
as 24-8024
Plaintiff: CUSTODIA BANK, INC.
Defendant: FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS and FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF KANSAS CITY
United States v. Palms
as 24-5026
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RAMAR TRAVELLE PALMS
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff: GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant: GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Goode, et al v. Montalbano
as 24-1171
Plaintiff: JAMES COREY GOODE and GOODE ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Counter Claimant: ALYSSA CHRYSTIE MONTALBANO
Defendant: JIRKA RYSAVY, GAIA, INC, WARKINS BRAD and others
Cross Defendant: LIGHT WARRIOR LEGAL FUND, LLC, DAVID WILCOCK, THE WILCOCK SPIRITUAL HEALING AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION and others
Insight Investments v. North American Specialty Insurance Company, et al
as 24-6076
Plaintiff: INSIGHT INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant: NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cross Defendant: SASHA M. BELL
Type: Contract Miller Act
Barrales v. Garland
as 24-9529
Petitioner: CASIMIRO ROMERO BARRALES
Respondent: MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
In re: Hennis
as 24-1174
Petitioner: In re: RICHARD HENNIS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?