Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 51 - 60 of 6,256
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1348
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Timothy Creany
as 24-1422
Plaintiff: JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant: JUDGE TIMOTHY CREANY
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Ned Nakles
as 24-1414
Plaintiff: JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant: NED NAKLES and NED J. NAKLES, JR.
Dion Horton, et al v. Administrative Judge Jill Rangos, et al
as 24-1325
Plaintiff: DION HORTON, DAMON JONES, CRAIG BROWNLEE and others
Defendant: ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE JILL RANGOS, in her official capacity, FRANK J. SCHERER, DIRECTOR OF ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE, in his official capacity, ANTHONY M. MARIANI, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUDGE and others
Nedal Elfar v. Township of Holmdel, et al
as 24-1353
Plaintiff: NEDAL ELFAR
Defendant: TOWNSHIP OF HOLMDEL, MICHAEL SASSO, MATTHEW MENOSKY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1673
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Murphy, et al v. State of Delaware Justices of the Peace, et al
as 24-1710
Plaintiff: WILLIAM MURPHY, individually and as guardian ad litem on behalf of A.T. and K.M. and TANISHA MURPHY
Defendant: STATE OF DELAWARE JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, THE HONORABLE ALAN DAVIS, in his official capacity only as Chief Magistrate of the Justices of the Peace, CONSTABLE HUGH CRAIG, individually and in his official capacity as a Constable of the Justices of the Peace and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1717
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Lisa Lenihan
as 24-1432
Plaintiff: JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant: LISA P. LENIHAN
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Richard McCormick, Jr.
as 24-1412
Plaintiff: JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant: JUDGE RICHARD E. MCCORMICK, JR.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?