Cases 51 - 60 of 55,813
(HC) Rile v. County of Sacramento
as 2:2024cv00844
Petitioner:
James Edward Eloy Rile
Respondent:
County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Palma Roque v. Warden
as 2:2024cv03561
Petitioner:
Kevin Palma Roque
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Scroggins v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Scroggins
Defendant:
Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonzo McKinney v. Rocha
as 2:2024cv02295
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKinney
Respondent:
Rocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Gonzalez v. St. Andre
as 2:2024cv00810
Petitioner:
Jose A. Gonzalez and Jose Alberto Gonzalez
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Rauda v. Calif. Dept. of Corrections and Rehab.
as 2:2024cv01908
Petitioner:
Anthony Rauda
Respondent:
Calif. Dept. of Corrections and Rehab.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jamaceeo Jamon Edwards v. Gavin Newsome
as 5:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Jamaceeo Jamon Edwards
Respondent:
Galvin Newsome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Wilhelm v. Mule Creek State Prison
as 2:2024cv01226
Petitioner:
Steve Wilhelm
Respondent:
Mule Creek State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv01220
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonsalves v. Superior Court Antelope Valley et al
as 3:2024cv00758
Petitioner:
Anthony David Gonsalves, Jr.
Respondent:
Superior Court Antelope Valley and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
