Cases 51 - 60 of 42,114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dillon-Marlin et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Demari Dillon-Marlin and Erik Dillon
Defendant:
Josh M. Lee, Clayton Farnes and Unified Police Department Greater Salt Lake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tolliver (PS) v. Kardashians et al
as 1:2024cv01354
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Kardashians, Beyonce Knowells, Usher Raymond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Armendariz, et al v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1201
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE ARMENDARIZ and CHINOOK CENTER
Defendant:
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, DANIEL SUMMEY, in his individual capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-8031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Terry, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 24-6046
Plaintiff:
SINCERE TERRY, MIA HOGSETT, TYREKE BAKER and others
Defendant:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Attorney General and VICKI ZEMP BEHENNA, in her official capacity as the Oklahoma County District Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
