Cases 51 - 60 of 5,666
Shortymacknifisent v. State of Minnesota For The Actions David S. Doty, The et al
as 0:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Defendant:
The State of Minnesota For The Actions David S. Doty, William Bolin and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gozo v. Skillet Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01193
Plaintiff:
Makusha Gozo
Defendant:
Skillet Inc., Warden, Kandihoyi County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mejia v. Muro
as 0:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Fernando Tello Mejia
Defendant:
Richard Muro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wattleton v. Krage
as 0:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
B. Krage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lohmeier v. Eishen
as 0:2024cv00941
Defendant:
Mr JOHN HAROLD LOHMEIER, Pltf
Petitioner:
John H. Lohmeier
Respondent:
B. Eishen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
King v. Ramsey County Jail et al
as 0:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Ramsey County Jail and All Ramsey County Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01125
Petitioner:
Andrew Glover
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enriquez v. Rarden
as 0:2024cv00344
Petitioner:
Rosendo Enriquez
Respondent:
Jared Rarden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Becerra v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv01100
Petitioner:
Erik Becerra
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
