Cases 51 - 60 of 50,130
Tejada v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tejada
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA. et al
as 5:2024cv01730
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA., BRIDGE OF HOPE CHURCH, ERIC MUHLENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA. et al
as 5:2024cv01736
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA., ERIC MUHLENBERG, CHRISTY BILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2024cv01737
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and DA JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Arviza
as 1:2024cv00345
Petitioner:
Jorge Chavez
Respondent:
Warden Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOJICA-MENDOZA v. FCI LORETTO WARDEN
as 3:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
DELMIS MOJICA-MENDOZA
Respondent:
FCI LORETTO WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Haitos v. Hainsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Austin Patrick Haitos
Respondent:
Melissa Hainsworth and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR BROWN
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, LIEUTENANT A TYNER, SGT. THOMAS BURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Yoder et al
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
Lieutenant Yoder, C.O. Lazicki and Hearing Examiner Yodis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey v. USA
as 3:2024cv00722
Petitioner:
Jesse Carey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
