Cases 61 - 70 of 53,788
Herring v. Collection Associates Ltd et al
as 5:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Susan Herring
Defendant:
Collection Associates Ltd and AvanteUSA Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hatton v. Southwest Recovery Services LLC
as 5:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hatton
Defendant:
Southwest Recovery Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kelly v. King
as 2:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Jessica Kelly
Defendant:
Matthew King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mcelroy v. The Bibb County Health Care Authority
as 7:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Astrid Mcelroy
Defendant:
The Bibb County Health Care Authority doing business as Bibb Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moss v. McClain
as 5:2024cv00584
Petitioner:
Scotty Dale Moss
Respondent:
Warden Antonio McClain and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawthorne v. Kizer et al
as 5:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Arice Hawthorne
Defendant:
Debra Kizer, Blake Dean, Donna Pate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swindle v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Swindle, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Capstone Building Corp v. Travis et al
as 2:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Capstone Building Corp
Defendant:
Christopher Travis, Michael Hendrickson, Zack Shewmaker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
