Cases 61 - 70 of 15,197
Moyle v. City of Princeton, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Mark Moyle
Defendant:
City of Princeton, Texas, Derek Borg and Brianna Chacon
Intervenor:
Matthew Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reyes v. Harris County
as 4:2024cv01415
Plaintiff:
Art Reyes
Defendant:
Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reid v. Garland et al
as 4:2024cv01417
Plaintiff:
Tyron Nathan Reid
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Alamdar Hamdini, Steve Dettelbach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sessanga v. City of DeSoto et al
as 3:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Charles Sessanga
Defendant:
City of DeSoto and J. Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boone v. Matthews
as 4:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
Bradley Thomas Boone
Defendant:
Kelly Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanna v. Cangshan Cutlery Company
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR HANNA
Defendant:
CANGSHAN CUTLERY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Copeland v. Nevarez et al
as 4:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Copeland
Defendant:
Jesus Nevarez, Jr, Judith Wells and Tarrant County (Family Courts)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mann v. Mayorkas
as 6:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Thapeloe John, Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIA Network et al v. The City of Kerrville
as 5:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
LIA Network, Liberty In Action, Terri Hall and others
Defendant:
The City of Kerrville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Academy of America et al
as 3:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Diamond King
Defendant:
Academy of America, Academy of Dallas, Lecester l Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
