Cases 61 - 70 of 12,857
Perkins v. Dallam et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
Ramsey Dallam, Steve Conrad, Detective Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Jones et al
as 0:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, Nathan Conley and Wesley Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. USA
as 5:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Reginald R. Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mitchell v. Knight
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
David Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Woodford County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Reginald Kenneth Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Woodford County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Jonathan Martinez
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rice v. Mosley
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dayton Rice, II, Peewee and Dayton Ray Rice, II
Defendant:
Jaime Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. USP Big Sandy, Medical Director et al
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Ford
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, Medical Director, Warden, USP Big Sandy, Albert Bourla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. Hatton et al
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Charles R. McNichols
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Chris Hatton, Captain Zackary Eubanks, Warden Bobbi Jo Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Charles R. McNichols
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Bobbi Jo Butts, Chris Hatton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
