Cases 61 - 70 of 999
Shavin v. Precision Franchising, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Abraham Shavin
Defendant:
Precision Franchising, Inc.
Stiles v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Stiles
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tyndall v. Sanuki Japanese Steak and Seafood Restaurant Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Tyndall
Defendant:
Sanuki Japanese Steak and Seafood Restaurant Inc., Duc H Nguyen and Sanuki Japanese Steak and Seafood Restaurant Inc. d/b/a Carolina Grill Seafood and Steak
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Reid et al v. Mr. Tokyo Monroe, LLC
as 3:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Chinreye Reid and Shenika Love
Defendant:
Mr. Tokyo Monroe, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Goins v. Swissport USA, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Darielle Goins
Defendant:
Swissport USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Landis v. The Elevance Health Companies, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00005
Defendant:
The Elevance Health Companies, Inc., The Anthem Companies, Inc. and Amerigroup Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kathy Landis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Piesco v. B&J Construction of NC, LLC
as 7:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Anthony Piesco
Defendant:
B&J Construction of NC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Boerner v. RHA Health Services, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Jacob Boerner
Defendant:
RHA Health Services, Inc. and RHA Health Services NC, LLC
Gibbs v. Creative Ways Cleaning, Inc.
as 7:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Trenton Gibbs
Defendant:
Creative Ways Cleaning, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
THOMPSON v. DURHAM FOODS, INC.
as 1:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
JERAMIE THOMPSON
Defendant:
DURHAM FOODS, INC. doing business as ZAXBYS RESTAURANTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
