Cases 61 - 70 of 10,748
Woodruff v. Etowah County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
William Woodruff
Defendant:
Etowah County Detention Center, Fountain, Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Segal
as 5:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Nicholos Kirk Roberts
Defendant:
Andrew John Segal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Young et al
as 7:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
James Young, Drew Wade, Andrew C Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Dr. Fish et al
as 7:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Dr. Fish, Ms. Perkins and Ms. Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv08007
Petitioner:
Adaisha Garrett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bush v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08008
Petitioner:
Daymon Maurice Bush
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Obechang et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jon Lenoska Johnson
Defendant:
Kristin Obechang, Chandler Caldwell, William Streeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. United States Marshals et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Petitioner:
Tracy Carroll
Respondent:
United States Marshals and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
Candice Cherie Martin
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phillips v. Ivey
as 4:2024cv00395
Petitioner:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Respondent:
Governor Katherine Ivey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
