Cases 61 - 70 of 44,395
Jeter v. Valet Living LLC
as 4:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Cooper Jeter
Defendant:
Valet Living LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanford et al v. Morris et al
as 6:2024cv03124
Plaintiff:
David Sanford, Drew Sanford, Revocable Trust Agreement of David K. Sanford and others
Defendant:
Jim Morris, Paul Freeman, TRock Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
***CASE ABANDONED OPENED IN ERROR SEE 4:24-cv-00302-SRB *** v. Jeter
as 4:2024cv00303
Defendant:
Cooper Jeter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walker v. USA
as 4:2024cv00297
Petitioner:
Robert D Walker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Montano v. Greene County Jail, et al
as 6:2024cv03120
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Montano
Defendant:
Greene County Jail and Jim Arnott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North Kansas City Destination Developers, LLC v. City of North Kansas City, Missouri
as 4:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
North Kansas City Destination Developers, LLC
Defendant:
City of North Kansas City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McElroy v. Beadles et al
as 6:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Raymond Glenn McElroy
Defendant:
Jonah Beadles and James Arnott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Doe I et al
as 6:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
