Cases 61 - 70 of 2,501
Brewer v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00483
Petitioner:
Renel Anthony Brewer
Respondent:
Victor Regalado, Eric Kitch and Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Irving v. Haney et al
as 4:2023cv00508
Plaintiff:
Luke Irving and Luke I Chrisco
Defendant:
Fullback Haney and Aaron Witt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. Walton et al
as 4:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Leonard
Defendant:
Scott Walton, K. Jones, Turn Key Health Clinics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Florentino v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00514
Petitioner:
Bautista Sanchez Florentino and Florentino Bautista-Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Barnett v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett, Christopher J Magnum and Chris Mangum
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Chaplin Bell, Chaplin Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funk v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00513
Petitioner:
Derek Funk
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferrell v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00441
Petitioner:
Johnny Van Ferrell, Jr
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davison v Harpe
as 4:2023cv00456
Petitioner:
Alonzo G Davison
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Savage v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Marquice Donnell Savage
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, The, Stephen Kunzweiler and Lauren Crudup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyce v. United States
as 4:2023cv00424
Petitioner:
Jennifer Boyce
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
